
Flicking through April’s edition of Money Marketing, I was struck by something odd.
Emblazoned across the front was the headline, ‘Pensions on life support’, and, in our cover story, news editor Dan Cooper wrote: “People aren’t saving enough but can’t afford to save more. How can the UK pensions system survive?”
It’s a vital question, and the industry must get to the bottom of it.
What is a pension if not a financial safety net?
The plight of pensions is no joke. Even before the cost-of-living crisis, we weren’t saving enough. Now, thanks to soaring inflation and crippling interest rates, worrying numbers of people are raiding pots to pay the bills.
Indeed, last year was one of the worst on record for outflows from advised platforms, with pensions being “hammered”, according to The Lang Cat. People just don’t have the spare cash.
Yet, turning a few pages more in MM, this headline too caught my eye: ‘Income protection sales are booming. Has the dial shifted on this protection underdog?’
‘Booming’ is a word we don’t see often enough in financial services today — especially when it comes to sales. But it’s certainly apt in IP’s case, with a record 247,000 policies bought last year — a 16% increase on 2022 and the highest figure since the Association of British Insurers started collecting data in 2000.
The thing is, protecting today’s income is seen as a ‘now’ problem. Retirement is deemed a ‘future’ problem
Three key factors appear to be behind the uptick: a carefully planned push from advisers, trade bodies and campaigners; the Consumer Duty changing the way advisers approach protection; and, interestingly, the rise in sickness absence since Covid.
Financial safety net
The protection industry is celebrating the long-awaited recognition of IP’s role in providing a financial safety net, as it should. This is a real coup.
But what is a pension if not a financial safety net? Why is extra cash seemingly being found to buy IP, but the same priority isn’t being made for pensions?
Last year was one of the worst on record for outflows from advised platforms, with pensions being ‘hammered’
A shout-out here to the Income Protection Task Force, a key player in the push of IP’s profile. Its annual IP Awareness Week has been hugely successful, as have its Seven Families and Seven Advisers campaigns. Where is the equivalent cheerleader for pensions?
But I want to look more closely at the Covid factor, especially the psychology at play. The pandemic highlighted the need for households to protect their income from the unexpected. It concerned younger people especially, with LV= finding that 8.3 million 25- to 44-year-olds without IP were considering taking out a policy in 2021. That’s a huge number from a notoriously apathetic group.
How do we ensure the defining moment doesn’t come too late?
The subsequent cost-of-living crisis has landed another financial punch, cementing IP’s status for many as a necessary expense. The thing is, protecting today’s income is a ‘now’ problem. Retirement income is deemed a ‘future’ problem. And human beings are not very good at delayed gratification.
Detached view
Did you know that, when we think of ourselves in the future, we use the same part of our brain as when we picture other people? Thinking of our future self is like thinking of a stranger. So being told we need to save money for our future self is regarded, essentially, as being told to give our money to someone else.
The future threat just isn’t tangible enough right now
Let me paint you a picture of how I — and likely many others my age — view retirement (and I’m not expecting this to go down too well with readers…).
I’m 36 and my parents, their friends and the parents of my friends are in their 60s and 70s. I see their colossal property profits, fantastic holidays, final-salary schemes and access to a state pension while they can still enjoy them. It will all work out for me like it did for them, right? Well, no.
Don’t get me wrong — I save into a pension and my measly pot already puts me in a better position than that of many. But should I have started saving earlier? Yes. Should I be saving more than the very minimum I can get away with under auto-enrolment? Also yes.
The plight of pensions is no joke. Even before the cost-of-living crisis, we weren’t saving enough
The problem is, the future threat just isn’t tangible enough right now.
Covid and the cost-of-living crisis have made protecting income a ‘now’ problem. What will it take for the same urgency to be felt with pensions? And how do we ensure the defining moment doesn’t come too late?
Maria Nicholls is features editor at Money Marketing
This article featured in the June 2024 edition of Money Marketing.
If you would like to subscribe to the monthly magazine, please click here.

Everything in this article is a wake up call. The next Government has a tough job on its hands and, regrettably, it is likely to be way down the batting order.
However, they need to look at auto enrolment (one of the sensible recent things (well, 2012) done. Up the minimum rates, insist that employers match whatever their employees put in and create long term incentives. Then don’t prat around with it!!
We need to get rid of the triple lock for pensioners (before anyone complains, I benefit from the triple lock!)as this distorts the pension landscape and make pensions more relevant to the younger age groups. We also need something like the IPTF.
Pensions, pensions, pensions….
What IS the obsession with it all??
Auto enrolement – have commented twice this week here MM – the clarion is always more…people, encompassment, contributions… we never hear less… charges, cessation of same after a good run, say, 15 years, choice…
Why not have an option to buy more of the State Pension, after all, a basic form already exists to make up for missed ‘years’?
Triple Lock? Makes up for the many years – pre 2011 – when State Pension was a bad joke! Affordable? What is? Advisers’ fees together with packaged provider charges make for poor deals… I don’t know many if any other professional lines of country which make recurring charges for an already paid for service…
Auto enrolement at 25, or a PP, adviser receives fees for 40 years + the initial… Wow…I conveyed your house…, I sold your house, I got you some tax back, I fixed your teeth, I treated your….
Passive income is where the gold is, of course, but as long as advisers lean heavily on third party training and product provision for just about everything they offer, who wants to pay a trail?
Pensions are a big ocean and, as GE said at their zenith, to make money in a big ocaen, you gotta be big!! Evidence? The TV supermarkets earn the owner much more than any IFA I know…
People seem to find money for what they want. I haven’t seen empty restaurants. On recent trips to Greece, France & Spain over the last 9 months or so, all the aircraft were full – no empty seats. Glastonbury sold out in minutes. No shortage of audiences for the theatre or concerts. This bleating about a shortage of money doesn’t seem to reflect on the facts on the ground. That’s not to say that I would deny that there are plenty of people who are hard up and can afford very little, but it isn’t universal. Why people don’t save into pensions has (in my view) two main causes. 1. It is too far in the future. 2. People believe that the State will provide. After all we live in a welfare state.
Well put!!
Your observation is confirmation of various economists – saving is only worth it IF you believe much more later is better than more now…