Pensions minister Paul Maynard described auto-enrolment as “an incomplete monument” at an event hosted by the Lang Cat today (8 February).
Speaking to the consultancy’s Tom McPhail, Maynard noted the successful delivery of auto-enrolment since its introduction in 2012 and the “fundamental change” it represented.
But he also acknowledged more needed to be done to ensure its future success, adding that the reforms outlined in the 2017 Automatic Enrolment Review “have my full support”.
Among the proposed reforms are expanding coverage by lowering the automatic enrolment age from 22 to 18, and abolishing the lower earnings limit so that contributions are payable from the first pound of earnings.
When asked more broadly about his vision for pensions, Maynard replied: “Politicians with a vision can be very dangerous.”
Instead, he emphasised the need to “sweat the small stuff” and said he was guided by the simple principle of “a pensions system that delivers a good standard of living for pensioners”.
Maynard added that he was influenced in this by his Blackpool North and Cleveleys constituency, which has a substantial elderly population and real economic difficulties.
However, he also recognised that there’s a “balance to be struck” between saving for a pension and spending in the present, especially during a cost-of-living crisis.
This, Maynard said, required “the right message at the right time” to sustain people’s interest in pensions.
“The engagement with an 18-year-old is different from a person two years from retirement,” he said, adding “you don’t want to scare people off”.
On the subject of the recent report by the International Longevity Centre – which suggested that the UK state pension age may need to rise to 71 by 2050 – Maynard was less committal, saying he hadn’t yet read the full document.
However, he emphasised that a government report into the same issue would need to take “a much wider perspective”, factoring in things such as the impact of Covid-19 on life expectancy.
Maynard ended by striking an optimistic note about the upcoming UK election, saying that those who thought it was a foregone conclusion “could be in for quite a shock”.
As ever – a politician that lives in a bubble. (Like they all do).
AE is better than nothing at all – but only marginally. Don’t you recognise that this is a very second-rate scheme with very limited investment choices and no real monitoring of progress by a competent adviser. Much of these schemes may do well just breaking even on contributions. Politicians would be advised to get into the real world. Ditch their top hat schemes and enter the real world of AE. Then they might really appreciate where it needs improving.
This headline much maligns the actual content. People have to live first and think about pensions after that. There are still people who believe that ‘bricks and mortar’ (property) are a better bet that Pensions for their retirement plans. Also, I believe that CGT NEEDS TO BE made the same percentages as income tax?
An incomplete Miss-Selling Scandal , Non Advised entrapment by product providers and Past and Future Pension Ministers. This has to stop. I can not think of a more fundamental flawed political abuse of legislation. After nearly forty years of giving advice 100% of which I am still accountable, savings for retirement income I am totally in agreement with, but Auto Enrollment, non advised is completely untenable. And Yes, I would be happy, to be question on it in open discussion.
I have a pension but my DIY Investment has been a
disaster. How many of us were passed round like a parcel by incompetent brokers who found us on a grey list now available to hackers?
My journey through hell is explained by Mapp LSE chat.
Mapp has given up and does not subscribe or buy on-line. She needs a compensation Expert.
LSE catches Private Investors in need of advice and
HL has problems with staff. Impossible situation.
Face to face quality advice cannot be replaced
by Starlink. London South East ? Mapp LSE chat.
Latest song not yet in circulation.
Nobody wants to go to work.
Why train to find a job.
Computer Systems are in charge
Teach how to win or rob.
Que sera, sera, whatever will be, will be,
An army without soldiers, a Navy without sailors?
Teachers, doctors all fed up.
LGBTXYZ diversity, woke? UK is broke.